User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    bend
    Posts
    1,494
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

    i'm in the middle of reading After the Future
    bifo has really got the wheels churning in my ole head
    bringing light and depth to sentiments i've held for a while

    another piece of the puzzle for the new-world disorder
    shit, i'm not going to even try to elaborate on this


    give these a few minutes when ya got em

    watch



    &

    read

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Dot in the Pacific
    Posts
    195
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

    Interesting, and definitely makes some points, but until a critical mass of mankind conquers his own mind, or at least a critical mass of people understand the nature of reality, no political system or otherwise will do any lasting help to anyone.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    29,891
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

    Actually I want to be Italian or at the least at leisure in Italy.
    Honestly there are no revelations here. I do appreciate his enthusiastic embrace of life.
    Thanks, this is a good listen.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    bend
    Posts
    1,494
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

    Quote Originally Posted by Too Tall View Post
    Actually I want to be Italian or at the least at leisure in Italy.
    Honestly there are no revelations here. I do appreciate his enthusiastic embrace of life.
    Thanks, this is a good listen.
    yeah, definitely nothing that hasn't been said a thousand times
    but i really enjoy hearing him say it

    somebody's gotta keep beating the drum

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    bend
    Posts
    1,494
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

    vsalon is good software atmo

    A call to the Army of Love and to the Army of Software

    By Franco Berardi and Geert Lovink

    October 2011. The fight opposing financial dictatorship is erupting.

    The so-called ‘financial markets’ and their cynical services are destroying the very foundations of social civilization. The legacy of the postwar compromise between the working class and progressive bourgeoisie has all but disappeared. Neoliberal policies are cutting back education and the public health system and is cancelling the right to a salary and a pension. The outcome will be impoverishment of large parts of the population, a growing precarity of labor conditions (freelance, short-term contracts, periods of unemployment) and daily humiliation of workers. The yet to be seen effect of the financial crisis will be violence, as people conjure up scapegoats in order to vent their rage. Ethnic cleansing, civil war, obliteration of democracy. This is a system we call financial Nazism: FINAZISM.

    Right now people are fighting back in many places, and in many ways. Occupy Wall Street inspired a mass mobilization in New York that is extending across the USA every day. In Greece workers and students are squatting Syntagma square and protesting against the blackmail by the European Central Bank, which is devastating the country. Cairo, Madrid, Tel Aviv, the list of the ‘movements of the squares’ is proliferating. On October 15 cities across the globe will amass with people protesting against the systemic robbery.

    Will our demonstrations and occupations stop the Finazist machine? They will not. Resistance will not resist, and our fight will not stop the legal crimes. Let’s be frank, we will not persuade our enemies to end their predatory attacks (‘let’s make even more profit from the next downfall’) for the simple reason that our enemies are not human beings. They are machines. Yes, human beings – corporate managers, stock owners, traders – are cashing the money that we are losing, and prey upon resources that workers produce. Politicians sign laws that deliver the lives of millions of people to the Almighty God of the Market.

    Bankers and investors are not the real decision makers, they are participants in an economy of gestural confusion. The real process of predatory power has become automated. The transfer of resources and wealth from those who produce to those who do nothing except oversee the abstract patterns of financial transactions is embedded in the machine, in the software that governs the machine. Forget about governments and party politics. Those puppets who pretend to be leaders are talking nonsense. The paternalistic options they offer around ‘austerity measures’ underscore a rampant cynicism internal to party politics: they all know they lost the power to model finance capitalism years ago. Needless to say, the political class are anxious to perform the act of control and sacrifice social resources of the future in the form of budget cuts in order to ‘satisfy the markets’. Stop listening to them, stop voting for them, stop hoping and cursing them. They are just pimps, and politics is dead.

    What should we do? Living with the Finazist violence, bending to the arrogance of algorithms, accepting growing exploitation and declining salaries? Nope. Let’s fight against Finazism because it is never too late. At the moment Finazism is winning for two reasons. First, because we have lost the pleasure of being together. Thirty years of precariousness and competition have destroyed social solidarity. Media virtualization has destroyed the empathy among bodies, the pleasure of touching each other, and the pleasure of living in urban spaces. We have lost the pleasure of love, because too much time is devoted to work and virtual exchange. The large army of lovers have to wake up. Second, because our intelligence has been submitted to algorithmic power in exchange for a handful of shitty money and a virtual life. For a salary that is miserable when compared to the profits of the corporate bosses, a small army of ‘softwarists’ are accepting the task of destroying human dignity and justice. The small army of software programmers have to wake up.

    There is only a way to awake the lover that is hidden in our paralyzed, frightened and frail virtualized bodies. There is only a way to awake the human being that is hidden in the miserable daily life of the softwarist: take to the streets and fight. Burning banks is useless, as real power is not in the physical buildings, but in the abstract connection between numbers, algorithms and information. But occupying banks is good as a starting point for the long-lasting process of dismantling and rewriting the techno-linguistic automatons enslaving all of us. This is the only politics that counts. Some say that the Occupy Wall Street movement lacks clear demands and an agenda. This remark is ridiculous. As in the case of all social movements the political backgrounds and motives are diverse, even diffuse and quite frequently contradictory. The occupation movement would not be better off with more realistic demands.

    What is thrilling right now is the multiplicity of new connections and commitment. But what is even more exciting is finding ways that can set in motion the collective ‘exodus’ from the capitalist agony. Let’s not talk about the ‘sustainability’ of the movement. That’s boring. Everything is transient. These fast-burning events do not help us to overcome the daily depression. Occupying the squares and other public spaces is a way to respond to the short duration of the demonstrations and marches. We are here to stay.

    We are not demanding a reform of the global financial system or the ECB. The return to national currencies of the past, as requested by the rightwing populists, will not make ordinary citizens less vulnerable to currency speculation. A return to state sovereignty is not the solution either, and many people already sense this. The demand for more ‘intervention’, control and oversight of markets is a hopeless gesture. The real issue is that humans are no longer in charge. We need to dismantle the machines themselves. This can be done in a very peaceful manner. Hack into their system, publish their crimes through Wikileaks-type initiatives and then delete their real-time trading killing networks for good.

    Financial markets are all about the politics of speed and deterritorialization. But we know their architectures and vulnerabilities. The financial world has lost its legitimacy. There is no global consensus anymore that the ‘market’ is always right. And this is our chance to act. The movement has to respond at this level. Decommissioning and re-programming financial software is not the dream of a Luddite sabotaging the machine. ‘Market regulation’ will not do the job, only autonomy and the self-organization of software workers can dismantle the predatory algorithms and create self-empowering software for society.

    The general intellect and the erotic social body have to meet on the streets and squares, and united they will break the Finazist chains

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    377
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

    Thanks for this, I'll have to find a copy of this book as it combines two of my great interests outside of bicycles. I spent some of my university days in Italy, on contemporary art I made my final year presentation on the development of Italian futurism, and then back in Australia I wrote my honours thesis on Toni Negri's (one of the key theoretical forces within Autonomia) philosophy of time and its relation to his political theory of the multitude. I'm now onto a PhD which started off with the post-Marxist critique of democracy, and then shifted direction through autonomism and situationalism and the "politics of every day life" to rest where it currently stands, which is an application of the ethics of the latter work of Foucault (ethics as "care of self") to radical politics, with a particular interest in the anarchist tradition- I'm currently reading William Godwin through Foucault. The relation between anarchism and socialism is of keen interest to me, and I think Autonomia is a particularly interesting, and potentially fruitful nexus between the two traditions.

    The key thread through all of this is an emphasis on politics as everyday activity, that the simple decisions that we make every day about how we go about living with ourselves and with others are of great political consequence. This really ties in to this idea of the end of "future" oriented politics - the most interesting trend in radical politics today (at least in my opinion) is the turn away from the utopian, teleological meta-narratives towards a more personal, diverse (multitudinous) present-focused politics. The track record for change of the "future" focused types has only lead to (serious) disapointment - five year plans and gulags - so we need to try something different

    Italian politics is really fascinating - the variety, breadth and depth of Italian political culture is unique. The anglophone world in particular for the most part of the last 50 years has been engaged in a fairly rapid homogenisation of political voices - Democrats and Republicans, Labor and Liberal/Conservative... they don't like you to think it, but for the most part the policy platforms are the same (or at very least the policy outcomes, as opposed to the rhetoric). In Italy there is always real dissent and it is always vocal, though unofortunately that dissent has often been accompanied by unnacceptable political violence. That dissent, however, provides for some really interesting discussions at the boundaries of the political which just don't really happen elsewhere (though the Occupy movement is perhaps the start of a positive new political counter-culture globally).

    One book I've found really interesting is Richard Day's Gramsci is Dead - it ties together anarchism and autonomism, and their contemporary manifestations, very well. Day focuses particularly on the the work of Gustav Landauer to express this need for an entirely new form of poltics - in the past radical movements either sought reform (piecemeal change to the structures of power) or revolution (claiming the structures of power for themselves). Both of these are forms of future focused politics. In the anarchism of Landauer, and in the autonomism of Negri as well, there is a third option - ignore the structures of power altogether and engage in the construction of new ways of being with each other. Italian has two words for what in English we have only one - power. Potere is the power of authority, potenza is the power of creation (for Negri in particular this is a creation in the present). We need to abandon the politics of potere in favour of a politics of potenza.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    bend
    Posts
    1,494
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

    dunno where i picked this up, maybe here?

    some good reading w/ c.carlsson
    latest post:

    http://www.nowtopians.com/book-revie...ings-uprisings

    http://www.nowtopians.com/

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    29,891
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: post-futurism, bifo, & autonomous marxism

    I've never strayed, in my mind, too far from my parents hippie attitudes on culture, tolerance and Semitic values. There is no "post" in my futurism only present. Currently my gaze is on planting a few figs and how to live among friends forever...with less.

    My life becomes increasingly less complicated as the (haha) future spins ever faster.

    So what is my take away from his prognostications? I'm not a complete dumbass and move easily past change.

    My chances are good. It's me and the cockroaches.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •