Dear Guest,
Please register or login. Content don't create itself!
Thank you
-
Bb386
Hi,
Is anybody using BB386 shells? If so, are you making them yourselves, or are they available off the shelf?
Cheers,
Lawrence
Lawrence Moran
-
Re: Bb386
Do they realize the irony in this statement?
"There have always been many standards of BB in the market. Those of us old enough will remember French threading, Swiss threading, as well as English and Italian. The Bike market follows trends that continue innovation. As opportunities arise to really improve performance, or adaptability, we believe the industry will adopt them, provided they make sense. Thanks to this new standard, cross platform adaptability, lighter weight, and increased BB surface area can now be had with one system."
- Garro.
-
Re: Bb386

Originally Posted by
steve garro
Do they realize the irony in this statement?
"There have always been many standards of BB in the market. Those of us old enough will remember French threading, Swiss threading, as well as English and Italian. The Bike market follows trends that continue innovation. As opportunities arise to really improve performance, or adaptability, we believe the industry will adopt them, provided they make sense. Thanks to this new standard, cross platform adaptability, lighter weight, and increased BB surface area can now be had with one system."
- Garro.
It never ceases to amaze that anything with a bearing and thread in a bicycle just lasts
However simplifying it to press fitting a bearing and it becomes a clusterfuck of incorrect tolerances and shiity manufacturing to save a buck
-
Re: Bb386
No irony meant at all; I'm simply curious as to the take up of this particular 'standard' amongst custom/low volume builders, as the use of press fit systems does appear to be increasing in this sector of the market. Putting aside the real world experience and concerns of some, I like the concept and (perhaps superficial) simplicity of the various press fit systems.
The debate surrounding the pros and cons of all the solutions will no doubt continue for some time to come. But I didn't intend to spark another run through, only to find out what those who are using press fit are doing!
Nonetheless, thanks for the reality check
Lawrence Moran
-
Re: Bb386

Originally Posted by
ljm
No irony meant at all; I'm simply curious as to the take up of this particular 'standard' amongst custom/low volume builders, as the use of press fit systems does appear to be increasing in this sector of the market. Putting aside the real world experience and concerns of some, I like the concept and (perhaps superficial) simplicity of the various press fit systems.
The debate surrounding the pros and cons of all the solutions will no doubt continue for some time to come. But I didn't intend to spark another run through, only to find out what those who are using press fit are doing!
Nonetheless, thanks for the reality check

The bicycle industry likes it's standards to include multiple choices.
Viva Whitworth!
- Garro.
-
Re: Bb386
It amazes me how well marketing guys can make a change (whose main benefit is reduction of cost in large volume manufacturers) into a must have improvement.
These marketing guys are pissing on your back and telling you its raining.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks