and now hes willing to let many of us die so he can see money numbers go up again, because people like him only know success if they can see money go up. winning is right, who will be the lucky winners tonight? the 41 year old doctor who died treating patients without equipment? so trump can get his wins in? dude, priorities, i dont get it
Matt Zilliox
/\/\/\
tl;dr for @Corso: How dare you have a different viewpoint and opinion!
i welcome all views, and i fully expect it for you 2. you guys are consistent. this isnt nor has it ever been a helpful addition to the conversation, any of the several times you have tried it. he presents his views, i present mine, you present yours, hors cat his, jayclay his, davids his, tootall his, ades his, and so on and so forth. we all do this. every now and again one of you even manages to make a thoughtful point, and i appreciate that. But if you think trumps response to this was good, or adequate, you are misinformed and biased, thats not opinion. there are people who simply know more about these things. i took the time to outline quite clearly how his response was inadequate. so refute those points if you must, but dont pretend like im being intolerant of ideas, im just challenging them when they require challenging. these baby games again. and the trumps gonna win bet the farm crap is simply annoying and counterproductive.
Matt Zilliox
I think it’s fairly obvious that no one in power gives a shit about the value of a dollar, since they all just agreed by 96-0 to print $2 trillion (=10% of US GDP). It’s a slippery slope. Not that I see a lot of better options... but... what stops us from printing another $2 trillion in six months? When does it stop? Why can’t we just do this all the time?
alternative facts.
I see, my replies are "unproductive"... Do you think your long winded rants actually accomplish anything but you venting?
You continue to blame every situation on Trump, sorry your wife is having issues - my wife is also in the medical field, but honestly, whatever negative situation presents itself, you blame the President. Period. End of your closed minded single focus Trump to blame discussion.
And he DID call for the partisan nonsense to stop, but the house and senate continue to be who they are. Don't blame Trump, blame the other elected officials. No, it's easier for you to shift into "Trump Rage".
I suppose it's his fault the bill Nancy & Co presented was filled with non-virus objectives. Funny, you seem to ignore that.
Winning IS the point, because the day Trump won, the Never Trumpers have done everything in their power to divide and try to get him out. Russia anyone? Impeachment baloney?
The Dems want to win. You want Trump to lose. Yeah, my friend, it is about winning. Elections have consequences - remember that statement from a past winner?
I love how EVERYONE is playing Monday morning Presidential quarterback on how the Government should be acting in this epidemic.
No, me saying he's going to win again isn't trolling, maybe it's me venting about how the Dems could not find a candidate capable of beating him (who should be so easy to beat, according to ALL the awful things he's done). Biden or Bernie? Those 2 are a better solution? We'll see.
Guy Washburn
Photography > www.guywashburn.com
“Instructions for living a life: Pay attention. Be astonished. Tell about it.”
– Mary Oliver
I see, my replies are "unproductive"... Do you think your long winded rants actually accomplish anything but you venting?
-it doesnt really matter does it, but yes, i think the information in some of my posts is useful, and some folks have messaged me words of encouragement, so i guess they arent totally pointless. you respond to them, which means you read them, and if you read them, you get the information from them. i know for a fact there is nothing anyone can say in here to change your mind, thats not the intent. again, you take things out of context man. calling one of your posts unproductive doesnt mean all of them are, why do you play this game?
You continue to blame every situation on Trump, sorry your wife is having issues - my wife is also in the medical field, but honestly, whatever negative situation presents itself, you blame the President. Period. End of your closed minded single focus Trump to blame discussion.
No, i dont blame everything on trump, thats not at all factual, but in trump topics, i speak about his inadequacies. again, you are ignoring any nuance at all, and you do this so often. My wife is an expert in this field, shes not just having issues, dont downplay things to that degree, this is serious. Trump's inaction and lack of leadership is costing these folks, period, do not attempt to dismiss or deny that fact.
And he DID call for the partisan nonsense to stop, but the house and senate continue to be who they are. Don't blame Trump, blame the other elected officials. No, it's easier for you to shift into "Trump Rage".
-no he did not, he immediately called this a democratic hoax. he immediately tried to place the democrats as his enemy. he has never made any sort of genuine gesture of togetherness. The house and senate are their own folks, and the republicans are cowards who fall into line with trump, blaming senators is blaming trump, surely this is quite clear at this point.
I suppose it's his fault the bill Nancy & Co presented was filled with non-virus objectives. Funny, you seem to ignore that.
-you are aware that that bill is now better for them having delayed and improved it... dont pretend otherwise, the bill is now a better bill, can you honestly say its not? as far as ignoring it, this is also a lie. I already addressed this as did others, or is your memory so short? we can go bring up the quotes about how you misinterpreted the article you posted again if you want to rehash that.
Winning IS the point, because the day Trump won, the Never Trumpers have done everything in their power to divide and try to get him out. Russia anyone? Impeachment baloney?
-winning is the point to you, the point to me is making good choices that improve life for humans. this is one thing we do not have in common, i dont understand this part of you or identify with it. thats fine, we are different, but you dont win at corona virus, you play well and hope for the best.
The Dems want to win. You want Trump to lose. Yeah, my friend, it is about winning. Elections have consequences - remember that statement from a past winner?
we are speaking about covid responses in here, forgive me if i dont care about yoru silly election predictions, i find them irrelevant right now
I love how EVERYONE is playing Monday morning Presidential quarterback on how the Government should be acting in this epidemic.
-sir, respectfully, my position is not armchair quarterback, and i have stated this. and its Thursday, keep up. YOU are playing armchair quarterback on this topic, you bring no expertise right? and you are treating this like football, cheering for your favorite team. I happen to live with an expert, I repeat this, because you seem to not be paying attention. she doesnt just "work in healthcare" man, shes a masters in public health and surgeon. this is literally her thing. so my insights as to the poor handling of this are that of an expert.
No, me saying he's going to win again isn't trolling, maybe it's me venting about how the Dems could not find a candidate capable of beating him (who should be so easy to beat, according to ALL the awful things he's done). Biden or Bernie? Those 2 are a better solution? We'll see.
-yes, either are a better solution, Biden a less better solution, but better none the less. Bernie has shown leadership already during this, he would quite obviously be doing a better job. anyone at all with a tendency to listen would be doing a better job. your opinions may tell you gut feelings are better than data and experts, but reality and statistics have proven that wrong every time.
Matt Zilliox
To add the the litany of 45's lies and obfuscations: his claim that the uptick in US case numbers is "a tribute to our testing" is downright false and dangerous.
As posted back somewhere in this thread an estimate of caseload can be back calculated from total deaths. Total deaths and total cases are showing the same doubling time (about 2.4 days, equivalent to x 10 in eight days). If these numbers are still current a factor of 1000 or more is appropriate, so the total number of actual cases is likely to be a million or more.
Mark Kelly
As always, we must agree to disagree. I could debate several of your "facts", but it's late and I'm tired.
Good for your wife, I'm impressed with her accomplishments. But tell me, if she was a Republican I bet she'd have a different view . I bet one could find many other surgeons who lean to the right, with an contrasting opinion.
I have a daughter with Lupus, and spend lot's of time with doctors/insurance companies/specialists. My wife also has a Masters in elder care and is an Executive Director of a health facility. Guess what? Some lower wage employees have already told her they may stay home as they may make more money with the proposed stimulus than having to work.
Interesting twist, no?
The party in power always wants "bipartisanship," i.e. you do what I want.
The minority party will object, but usually give in to appeals to national emergency. See Republicans, circa 2008-2009, and before that Democrats in 2001.
The circumstances do not change the partisan dynamic, they only change who wants what.
As for what happened in the past couple days, the Democrats played pattycake for 3x the money the Republicans held at gunpoint during the last bailout. If we're grading by Tea Party standards, I'd give them a gold star for behaving in the public interest.
3.3 million people filed first time claims for unemployment last week. That's the most by far, ever.
The stock market then went up 6%.
I cannot imagine two numbers that more illustrate the basic problem of our times: millions of people are filing for unemployment, and simultaneously the market is rejoicing.
You can't choose to stay home to collect unemployment, you have to be laid off.
There's no possibility of unemployment benefits paying out more than an existing job, because if you quit a job voluntarily you won't get the benefits.
The Welfare Queen myth circa 1996 sure dies a slow death, or maybe just has nine lives on the right.
Today's number is just the confirmed data that has already been much discussed in the markets for the past few weeks. Goldman had a Sunday night conference call on 3/15 (1500 participants called in) which discussed economic predictions, infection rates etc etc. It was very bleak and that forecast is what helped stoke the panic on Monday morning. There is a range of projections for unemployment over the next few months ranging from 11mm to 30% of the work force. The worst month in the 2008/2009 financial crisis was -800,000 and the total job losses from Feb 2008 until October 2009 were 7.1mm or so. (I could pull the revised data and give you exact number, but I just need to hit the side of the barn, don't need a bullseye)
A lot of the action in the market is just technical now as it is Quarter End and asset managers will have to adjust their portfolio weightings as risk weights have changed.
The ultimate hurdle will be earnings in Q2. General Mills CEO said 90% of stores handling their food products were open, but uptake has been slow and sales are only about 50% of normal. This is the risk for specific companies as people's buying habits will take time to return if at all. They will reevaluate some material wants as their perspective on life has changed.
And as you take the next level of data, 12% of New York cases need hospitalization and 25% of those need a ventilator. So even with the 4000 extra ventilators, at those growth rates you get a few extra days. That's the bottleneck and the point that will effect the outcome changing from a 1% to higher Italian curve model. I think they need the curve to flatten before 300k. I am optimistic that will happen. I don't know what more Cuomo can do. He did get shame the FEDGOV to send the 4000 instead of the 400 they were promising.
Bookmarks