i don't understand the existence of Whistle Pig. Terrible stuff. After the first few tries, it never left the shelf. When we moved, I think 1/2 a bottle was poured down the drain to save the effort of putting it in a box. Given the price, people must like the stuff but it didn't work out over here.
Trod Harland, Pickle Expediter
Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced. — James Baldwin
Learned long time ago, and keep learning , 'buy right or buy twice'. easy to justify if you buy and hold. Read the DI2 example and I don't agree this means buying the most bells and whistles, but rather one should pay up for quality. To me that means Ultegra of Dura Ace mechanical and not 105 or lower. Been riding my C-59 for 4 years and still don't feel that the bike is dated or not the very best. I might have felt that way if I bought a lower end Colnago or lower end group set.
Buying the best can easily be misunderstood to mean ceramic bearings and loads of gadgets and I think that is a distortion.
Bought a high end steel Breitling 12 years too. Still wearing it and it feels brand new to me. Ditto a BMW 3 series. Unlike previous Hondas and Mercuries this feels brand new and still state of the art to me. -Mike G
Actually, what I believe you meant to say is that there can sometimes be intangible benefits to some bikes that you find particularly attractive. Put that way, the equation is still true.
In other words, one could arbitrarily jack up the numerator to the point where you're comfortable with the value and go for it. ;)
I've been riding the Big Leg Emma since 2006. It's on its second paint job and third group. With repaint, I got a FD braze-on installed. That bike is the definition of intangibles.
And for brown liquor, I have a plastic cup that I fill with 1/2" of filtered water and place it in the freezer until solid. I pour the liquor on the "frozen pond". My current liquor of choice is Balcones Rumble.
Retired Sailor, Marine dad, semi-professional cyclist, fly fisherman, and Indian School STEM teacher.
Assistant Operating Officer at Farm Soap homemade soaps. www.farmsoap.com
That is not what I am saying at all. My point is value doesnt matter with stuff like bikes. You can say Ultegra which is a great value, etc, etc. But if you can afford Dura ace you buy dura ace unless some moral-like factor in your head tells you no. Value matters only in economics not in hobbies. I never bought a bike because of its good value. I buy the best bike I could afford. I buy a stock or make a business decision on value. Thats my point.
Last edited by joosttx; 10-27-2017 at 10:43 AM.
You are lucky husbands. My wife is into the four figure handbags (significant others know about N+1 too). They are heirloom pieces that she takes care of so that maybe the next generation will want/use them.
She has a Louis Vuitton that was her mother's, has been repaired (worn out straps), and will still last a very long time.
She has a Ferragamo (actually, a few) that should last a lifetime if cared for correctly. And has the shoes as well.
And I am sure there are many hidden away that I do not know about in addition to the 20 or so I do know about at the same quality level.
As to Coach (my sister worked for them for many years), they have changed from a classic maker of quality lifetime products to a company that chases the latest design trend and makes all their crap in China but sold at a premium so I am not surprised by your experience. My wife has a bag she got twenty years ago (the bucket bag?) and was a recently introduced "classic". When compared to the newer model, hers has thicker and better quality leather made in the USA in addition to solid brass buckles. The newer version has crappier thin leather with terrible tanning and crappy buckles that have been painted to look like brass. It's just not the same.
For me, I buy quality and hope I get a good value (i.e. I have some Brooks Brothers shirts that should be thread bare if you knew how old they are but they just last).
Last edited by Matthew Strongin; 10-27-2017 at 05:54 PM.
Not moral exactly. What I'm trying to get at is that I might not think Dura Ace is too expensive or excessive. I might just want something aesthetically different: Shiny campy! Or something I want for a whole different set of reasons. Like a nice clean Sante group. I guess what I was trying to say is these decisions are made on a much more complex set of axes than "value" vs. "utility" or what's "best". Because there's lots of bests. I agree with your point that we are not really making cost/benefit decisions.
Suck on this, from the middle shelf.
Pouring Whistle Pig down the sink is like throwing away a bike with Dura-Ace 7400 because it has downtube shifters.
Last edited by thollandpe; 10-27-2017 at 09:48 PM.
Trod Harland, Pickle Expediter
Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced. — James Baldwin
Value isn't measured simply in rational or dollars amounts. There can be all sorts of benefits, some easy to quantify, others much harder and not necessarily in pure functional terms.
Why do some folks purchase $80k cars, when a $30k car can transport them just as reliably and in equal comfort?
Clearly for some people there must be some benefits to $80k cars that allow them to justify the purchase.
Bookmarks