Yes, it was likely conceived for rear brakes, but I do admit that it looks cleaner on the front too, with the proper fork. now we need to wait for the market to catch up and provide a nice FM, thru axle disc fork with clearance for 35c's.
Yes, it was likely conceived for rear brakes, but I do admit that it looks cleaner on the front too, with the proper fork. now we need to wait for the market to catch up and provide a nice FM, thru axle disc fork with clearance for 35c's.
Matt Moore
I know that, I'm just saying this is the frame builders section, forks are part of the frame. You will never convince me otherwise.
I didn't say anything to that effect.
find me a carbon flat mount fork that you can buy that isn't attached to a bike and I will build around it.
building a fork is a whole different thing.
Matt Moore
Building a fork for flat mount may not always be straightforward. The reason for this is that the front mounts are located very close to the axle centerline. 11mm is the offset. The fork leg diameter has to be limited(not ideal for dealing with disc braking forces), or bent and flattened to bring the tube into position. If the leg is 22mm diameter or less(and centered on the axle) it will probably not be an issue.
tech_details_roadhouse3.jpg
Here is one. They accept western union too.
2016 Carbon Fork Road,Disc Flat Mount,Through Axle,TR-FK071CF, View carbon fork road disc flat mount, OEM Product Details from ArchTeks Tech Co., Limited on Alibaba.com
PM looks neat too, but the problem raised and the introduction of this new standard is to avoid threaded inserts in the carbon frame. As far as carbon forks, whether you have FM or PM there is still a threaded instert bonded in the frame; and if you ask me, in beteween the two devils, I will always have a locked rear rear but never want a jammed caliper in the front one!
Again, unless I'm missing something, FM could work on steel forks, not on carbon ones as it doesn't solve any problems at all.
This FM thing seems it just creates more SKU's and stock to keep.
You got it man, attaching more things where the forks are likely to have a smaller diameter, is it a good idea?
Andrea "Gattonero" Cattolico, head mechanic @Condor Cycles London
"Caron, non ti crucciare:
vuolsi così colà dove si puote
ciò che si vuole, e più non dimandare"
I'm waiting for the first flat mount to post mount adapter.
I would think that flat mount forks will be 12mm TA, which looks like it will clear the bottom insert just fine. There are threaded inserts in current carbon forks. While it might not be ideal, I'm not sure it can be avoided
Thanks Drew, I saw those and it didn't sink in
-Matthew Broadbent
how much of a pain was it to set up?
Looks like a good amount of the chainstay needed to be mitered out. great execution.
Matt Moore
Not actually my handywork (although it will be my frame). Ricky Feather is the fabricator. He said it was tricky, probably being the first, but I'm sure it's one of those jobs that gets easier once you've done a few!
-Matthew Broadbent
A simple alternative is possible.
Install a vertical disc tab, similar to the traditional ISO mount. The hole center to hole center dimension does not have to be 51mm. Then fabricate an adapter for the 34mm flat mount caliper, where the caliper is bolted from below. The whole system could be similar to an ISO tab with a post mount adapter. It would raise the caliper above the chainstay slightly, but would be much easier to do than mitering the chainstay.
is the standard available online?
Ewen Gellie
Melbourne Australia
full-time framebuilder, Mechanical Engineer, (Bach. of Eng., University of Melbourne)
[url]www.gelliecustombikeframes.com.au[/url]
[URL="http://instagram.com/gellie_custom_bikes"]http://instagram.com/gellie_custom_bikes[/URL]
Bookmarks