Dear Guest,
Please register or login. Content don't create itself!
Thank you
-
Re: I guess it wasn’t “settled law” after all

Originally Posted by
jclay
Roe.
Big surprise; is there no mechanism by which a sitting SCOTUS judge may be removed for lying, deception (aka lying), obfuscation (aka lying under the circs framing the confirmation process)?
And as a bonus, more firearms in the streets!
A wet dream for those who think they're the Marlboro Man or mourn that they missed the Dodge City daze of Marshal Dillon.
It's called extreme coaching. I paid extra attention during the confirmation of Amy Comey Barrett where I started hearing a term I had not before "Super Precedent" . There's no way to know how a Supreme Court justice will decide for sure in most cases, but this was different. The Federalist Society vetted first and foremost on this one issue. Those put on the court know why they are there. Even if it was never discussed, it didn't need to be.
I'm surprised at the extreme position. The decision makes no room for abortion to protect the mother's life which would be consistent with the Orthodox Jewish view. And even though Orthdox Judaism doesn't support abortion in other cases, the fetus is not considered a full human being until after born -Mike G
Similar Threads
-
By rwsaunders in forum The OT
Replies: 7
Last Post: 07-16-2021, 02:03 PM
-
By thollandpe in forum The OT
Replies: 0
Last Post: 05-08-2020, 06:48 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks