Dear Guest,
Please register or login. Content don't create itself!
Thank you
-
To bridge or not to bridge, that's the chainstay question
Well, the post title says it all, but...
¿What's your own personal opinion on road frame chainstay bridges?
Absolute must for performance? fatigue risers?
Yes? no? wtf?
talk to me
-
Re: To bridge or not to bridge, that's the chainstay question
Traditionally, they are (were) there for bracing a fender. Then, the multi-use unit morphed in a racing machine (late 1960s and through the 10 speed bicycle boom in the early 1970s). The brace was never questioned as for its being there, unused. Folks say it adds strength. I don't believe it as something that a human being can discern. I got used to the aesthetic element of a lapped bridge on a 22.2mm round stay so my bicycles had them. When I switched to oval stays in the late 1990s, I ceased brazing them in atmo.
-
Re: To bridge or not to bridge, that's the chainstay question
Seems that, once again, think don't follow applies
Thanks
-
Re: To bridge or not to bridge, that's the chainstay question
My powertap hub can discern no meaningful difference in peak watts on bridgeless bike vs a bike w/ a bridge.
-
Re: To bridge or not to bridge, that's the chainstay question
Here is a thread with contributions from eRichie, Curt Goodrich, Dave Anderson, and Frank the Welder:
http://www.velocipedesalon.com/forum...dge-27065.html
-
Re: To bridge or not to bridge, that's the chainstay question

Originally Posted by
Pi Guy
Sorry for not having do the homewrok first, lazy me, guilty on all charges.
Similar Threads
-
By werksmini in forum The Frame Forum@VSalon
Replies: 12
Last Post: 02-04-2015, 09:00 PM
-
By jclay in forum The Frame Forum@VSalon
Replies: 19
Last Post: 08-16-2014, 04:37 PM
-
By hgrd in forum The Frame Forum@VSalon
Replies: 22
Last Post: 09-09-2012, 06:58 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks