Hi All, first post. I searched and didn't see anything.
I'm roughing out a design for a utility cycle and would really like it to fit both my wife (5'5") and I (6'0") as well as possible, and also just a spectrum of riders in general. In my research i've been extremely impressed with the design of the Xtravois 2.0 by Quixote Cycles. This bike incorporates (for the very reason i mentioned, i suppose there is no other reason to do such a thing) "Adaptive Seat Tube Technology" which they attribute to Henry Cutler's Workcycle Fr8 bike.
Basically, instead of terminating at the BB shell like normal, the seat tube terminates on the DT a few inches ahead of the BB. This gives a smaller ST angle. The idea is that as you extend the seatpost you get both a longer reach to the cranks and a longer reach to the handlebars. The as you extend it, the seat is supposed to arrive in a position very similar to what you would normally get with the next size larger frame. Combined with a telescoping steerer or adustable stem, this would in theory provide a bike that could very well suit riders of varying sizes.
You probably knew all of that.
My question is, does it work? I don't think there are any bikes in my area that i can try. Maybe when i'm in Portland I could try one, but i don't get up there often. I'd love to here the experiences and opinions (hopefully informed opinions) on how this all plays out in the real world. Any big compromises or downsides to the design? I'm sure it isn't perfect, but is it reasonably good? Good enough to incorporate into a design?
After that, the next question would be, what legal considerations are there when considering use of this design feature.
Thanks,
Troy
Bookmarks