Re: And now for something completely different
Very interesting. Good luck with the venture, Mark. FWIW, I think it's the right approach to start with the wine bars.
Tell me more about natural wine, or the non-existence of it. I understand the notion of low intervention but must confess that I haven't been able to put my head around natural wine completely. The term seems to be a self-contradiction as a start.
I recently lunched at a one-man resto in Foggia whose proprietor, despite Foggia not being a wine making region, makes his own red wine and liqueur. The wine was slightly cloudy and had particles floating around, so I'm guessing it is 'natural' or at least 'low intervention'.
Re: And now for something completely different
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chik
Tell me more about natural wine, or the non-existence of it. I understand the notion of low intervention but must confess that I haven't been able to put my head around natural wine completely.
Thanks for the well wishes, Chik.
Re "natural" wine: a vineyard is a monoculture of an exotic species, the produce of which is manipulated by humans for cultural ends. If that's natural, so is heroin.
I do use the term minimal intervention. To me, that means only intervening when needed but not doing anything that masks or "corrects" what's there from the vineyard.
I have two rules for winemaking:
Rule 1: start with good fruit.
Rule 2: don't fuck it up.
FWIW in one of my other jobs I make wine for a more traditionally focused winery and there are a bunch of things I do there that are aimed at making the wine in a more "polished" style because that is what the owner wants*. We consistently get 95+ point scores from critics and the wines are noted as being examplars of their region and varieties so it's not like the extra intervention completely masks what's already there.
* There's an interesting aside here about social class, which is the elephant in the room when discussing wine. So much of the wankery surrounding wine comes down to the fact that wine was very much a class marker: for centuries England dominated the wine trade and the great merchants targeted the upper class, for logical reasons.
It even got enshrined in French wine law: the wineries (not the vineyards) of Bordeaux were divided in to the Grands Crus, the crus bourgeois, the crus artisans and the crus paysans. To each according to his means. It's no coincidence that two of the five "Premier Grands Crus Classes" are owned by arms of the Rothschild family: nothing gave social cachet like owning one of these estates.
Re: And now for something completely different
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mark Kelly
So much of the wankery surrounding wine comes down to the fact that wine was very much a class marker.
They tend to be tedious bores, that lot. And there's a new breed that goes on about natural wines...
Re: And now for something completely different
I published a gastronomic guide to Kyoto this week, and in it, I mention a saké brewer whose 11th generation, in the 1950s, decided to develop a purer form of saké that doesn't cause a hangover. That excludes the use of sugar and brewing alcohol, making the process take a lot longer. I don't think they would imagine characterising their products as being natural.
Funnily enough, 3 days after launch, my guide is ranked #4 in Dining Travel Reference and #8 in Japanese Travel over at Amazon Australia. Over at Amazon US, it's #1 New Release in Culinary Travel. Not a lot of competition these days, I take it.
Re: And now for something completely different
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mark Kelly
I have two rules for winemaking:
Rule 1: start with good fruit.
Rule 2: don't fuck it up.
That's the hardest thing to do. No gimmicks, nothing to hide. Bloody difficult.