So I sit here in the reading Cyclingnews and there are discussions by racers and former racers and managers on the pros and cons of race radios. Personally, I'm not a fan of them but I'm also not riding in the pro peloton so I can't really judge their positions. I don't think there is much doubt that racing is far, far more controlled than it used to be with much less spontaneity than there used to be pre-radio. Seems a couple of super teams control the races, especially the hilly stages in the big tours, until the final climb.
I'm not a big fan either of the UCI and some of their backwards positions on technology. So the question is: Who supports race radios in pro cycling?
I don't really agree that they advance safety, though it is also without doubt that roads in Europe have changed in the past 20-30 years, with far more dividers for pedestrians and far more roundabouts installed at intersections which used to either be virtually uncontrolled or have stop lights. These can both create safety hazards for big packs of cyclists moving at high speeds.
But so can talking on a radio instead of concentrating on cycling.
AFAIK, there's only one guy here who participated in big time bike racing as a member of the peloton. This is, of course, Flux. He can comment with authority. My own racing was at a level where it didn't really matter and in any case was in the pre-radio era.
For or against? Lay it down. The road season is upon us.
Bookmarks