I apologize; I tried to search for my original post and the search engine couldn't find it.
The Cliff's Notes version:
I bought a used trainer on eBay. The seller shipped it uninsured with a tracking number. The Postal Service lost the trainer but sent the seller a cut out section of the box with the To/From address on it and suggested he file a claim.
I waited patiently but after enough time passed without U.S. Postal answering the seller's claim, I suggested to him that he consider issuing me a refund.
The seller's attitude seemed to be it wasn't his problem; he figured his responsibility ended when he dropped it off at the Post Office.
I thought I was screwed.
So, I invoked eBay's Buyer Protection Program. I had to "escalate" my claim (eBay's term and procedure) because the seller wasn't budging. This is sort of a last ditch process at resolving any problems with the seller.
Ebay sent me an e-mail within 24 hours of escalating my claim. Their e-mail said, " "We" issued you a full refund...", so that implies eBay paid me for the loss, right?
Well, in the Comments section of their findings they said their justification for finding in my favor was "(eBay) didn't receive valid tracking information from the seller." This sounds odd because I had a valid tracking number and was able to watch the package's progress until it was lost. Perhaps eBay meant the tracking number was invalid because it didn't show the package delivered?
So I said above that eBay claimed THEY issued me a refund. I assume the money came out of their pocket. When I checked my PayPal account, it shows the refund coming from THE SELLER.
My question is, did eBay pressure the seller to refund the money or did they pay out of their own pocket? What was their leverage?
Bookmarks