A pal I used to work with called me with some Campag questions this week.
He's got a client with an incoming lugged steel frame from a custom builder,
and wants to build it "with all silver Campagnolo parts".
So i tell him to order up some centaur alloy stuff, and point him to some
sources for the seat post, alloy version of the rear der, and explain how
the 09 new shifters differ from the previous ones, and how the 06 alloy
one's have the 'good' mechanism.
It's a no go. The client is miffed that he even suggested "centaur"...
"what? you saying my frame isn't good enough for Record!!!"
The guy seemed insulted. My pal back tracks a bit, calls me again...
"Can't you come up with some of the good alloy record stuff for him???"
he begs.
I had a hard time explaining what the actual differences would be between
the pre carbon era Record stuff, and the last few years Centaur alloy would
actually be. Finish quality? nope. Weight? nope. Performance? nope.
Besides the few ti bolts, and a bit on machining on the right crank arm,
the biggest construction difference is the brakes don't have a blind centerbolt.
Chainrings and chain are identical, and quite a few small parts share the
exact same code numbers.
Anyway, thought maybe you'd enjoy some pics I 'rounded up for him,
we'll see if his client is truly interested in paying 4 to 5 times the price
for different logos. The fact that there is no 10 speed alloy Record rear der
leads me to believe the guy would pay a premium for an inferior 9 speed
drivetrain because it says "record" on it...
-g
![]()






Reply With Quote








Bookmarks